1 Comment

I completely agree with the your analysis of the situation in Syria and wider West Asia. The fall of Assad's regime is indeed a pivotal moment, but it’s clear that the West, especially the Zionist entity, has no interest in peace. As the article correctly notes, "the fall of Syria is not the 'beginning of peace in the Middle East' as some people say. On the contrary, the changes..." are likely to lead to even more regional instability. Indeed, I suggest further instability is certain.

This situation is a continuation of the neoconservative/Zionist "Clean Break" strategy from 1996, which has long aimed at fragmenting West Asia, fostering sectarianism, and ultimately weakening any force that opposes Western and Zionist dominance—most notably Iran. The West thrives on chaos in the region; it sees this instability as a means to maintain control in West Asia, and by extension, safeguard its global hegemony.

In this context, Assad's fall is hardly a victory for peace or democracy but a much-needed stepping stone to further destabilizing a region that has been torn apart by imperial interventions for decades.

Expand full comment