Iran’s authority won’t fall tomorrow, but its race toward nuclear weapons could redraw the Middle East, shatter U.S.–Israeli dominance, and accelerate the end of petrodollar power.
The real problem lies in western arms and its hellbent obsession with controlling and/or destroying ‘other’ people and their resources. For the west, trade is not preferred. They must possess and control all that is deemed valuable and essential, others be damned. Western alliances tolerate one another on this narcissistic tendency alone.
And they couldn't even use such a weapon even if they had it, as WMDs as a mass CIVLIAN killing weapon, and that breaks every Islamic precept of war laid down in the Qoran.
(Not that the fake "Islamic" colonies of the Western empires care about that document).
Exactly. What's the point of Islamic law if fundamentally broken? What's the point of standing against an enemy if becoming just like him in the process?
The solution recommended by the author doesn't make any sense simply because neither Israel nor USA can ever be trusted. Both are rogue countries.
I am referring to the below quoted lines from the article :
"The best solution would
be for the U.S., Israel, and Iran to reach a balance of power and a compromise, whereby Iran temporarily refrains from developing nuclear weapons in exchange for the U.S. and Israel not attempting to overthrow the Iranian regime. This is likely the most effective solution to the current situation."
Maybe Israel should be moved to the western deserts of the United States. Parts of the area are beautiful, and they would be protected. The world can probably trust the Israeli people, but it cannot trust the government of Israel.
Acquiring, maintaining & deploying nuclear weapons is a huge undertaking in itself. Just having them doesn't preclude interference & provocation, as we see clearly in the USA/UK endless war against Russia. It is useful to know that the chaos caused by agent provocateurs is far out weighed by the supportive street demonstrations by pro-Iran Iranians! CIA/MOSSAD/MI6 plans to destabilize Iran simply will not work.
The real problem lies in western arms and its hellbent obsession with controlling and/or destroying ‘other’ people and their resources. For the west, trade is not preferred. They must possess and control all that is deemed valuable and essential, others be damned. Western alliances tolerate one another on this narcissistic tendency alone.
Iran: damned if they do, damned if they don't.
And they couldn't even use such a weapon even if they had it, as WMDs as a mass CIVLIAN killing weapon, and that breaks every Islamic precept of war laid down in the Qoran.
(Not that the fake "Islamic" colonies of the Western empires care about that document).
Exactly. What's the point of Islamic law if fundamentally broken? What's the point of standing against an enemy if becoming just like him in the process?
The solution recommended by the author doesn't make any sense simply because neither Israel nor USA can ever be trusted. Both are rogue countries.
I am referring to the below quoted lines from the article :
"The best solution would
be for the U.S., Israel, and Iran to reach a balance of power and a compromise, whereby Iran temporarily refrains from developing nuclear weapons in exchange for the U.S. and Israel not attempting to overthrow the Iranian regime. This is likely the most effective solution to the current situation."
Maybe Israel should be moved to the western deserts of the United States. Parts of the area are beautiful, and they would be protected. The world can probably trust the Israeli people, but it cannot trust the government of Israel.
Acquiring, maintaining & deploying nuclear weapons is a huge undertaking in itself. Just having them doesn't preclude interference & provocation, as we see clearly in the USA/UK endless war against Russia. It is useful to know that the chaos caused by agent provocateurs is far out weighed by the supportive street demonstrations by pro-Iran Iranians! CIA/MOSSAD/MI6 plans to destabilize Iran simply will not work.