If you read Glenn Diesen’s new book “Ukraine War & Eurasian World Order” (FEB 2024, I am only at the beginning) it is interesting to note that the US post-WW2 for its growing hegemony encouraged conflicts in Eurasia as a means of maintaining lead control of region’s resources. This is similar to UK highlighting regional differences in West Europe during peak of their power.
BRICS+ will inevitably come into conflict with US-dominated West as it encourages a model of competition where Eurasian and African players prioritize their own continued development. The US’ main strategy was always going to be controlling West Europe through NATO/EU, Central Asia through Saudis/Israel and East Asia through Japan.
As their anchors of **control** in these regions (West, Central and East Eurasia) falter, encouraging **instability** switches to being major way of US staying ahead in what they see as a zero-sum competition for control against any potential peer.
Major EU nations like Germany or Turkey drawing closer to Russia, Saudis drawing closer to Central Asian neighbors like Iran, and Japan getting closer to other East Asian neighbors is an inherent threat to US hegemony that will never be allowed. That would be best for those countries, but the world needs more time.
Thanks for the reading recommendation, it seems to be a very interesting book. From what you say, it basically confirms Brzezinski's doctrine by enriching it with newer elements of future vision that we often find ourselves talking about in our videos or articles. Unfortunately, the so-called "democratic" West considers any demand for reform or emancipation by other nations as an aggression against its own hegemonic status, and this, we believe, is going to complicate the international scenarios more and more, especially this year, at least until the US elections, which will be the turning point that will mark the victory or defeat of the globalist elites.
It is surprising you all find that US elections will mark such a turning point. Not that I disagree or agree, but have you all made content regarding why that would so markedly be the case?
We were thinking of doing a video on elections around the world, because this year there have been and will be several important election dates for the BRICS countries (Russia, India, South Africa) as well, so we could address the U.S. elections as well. But we have not yet decided to do that for several reasons. To stay with the U.S., we would like to explain that this year's elections are, in our opinion, different: although many people think that nothing will change in case Trump wins, we are instead of the opinion that this time Trump himself and his associates are less naive than in the previous term and much better equipped to counter the Deep State, the real administrator of the U.S. government. We don't like to make predictions, but in this case it is hard to hold back in this kind of analysis.
If you read Glenn Diesen’s new book “Ukraine War & Eurasian World Order” (FEB 2024, I am only at the beginning) it is interesting to note that the US post-WW2 for its growing hegemony encouraged conflicts in Eurasia as a means of maintaining lead control of region’s resources. This is similar to UK highlighting regional differences in West Europe during peak of their power.
BRICS+ will inevitably come into conflict with US-dominated West as it encourages a model of competition where Eurasian and African players prioritize their own continued development. The US’ main strategy was always going to be controlling West Europe through NATO/EU, Central Asia through Saudis/Israel and East Asia through Japan.
As their anchors of **control** in these regions (West, Central and East Eurasia) falter, encouraging **instability** switches to being major way of US staying ahead in what they see as a zero-sum competition for control against any potential peer.
Major EU nations like Germany or Turkey drawing closer to Russia, Saudis drawing closer to Central Asian neighbors like Iran, and Japan getting closer to other East Asian neighbors is an inherent threat to US hegemony that will never be allowed. That would be best for those countries, but the world needs more time.
Thanks for the reading recommendation, it seems to be a very interesting book. From what you say, it basically confirms Brzezinski's doctrine by enriching it with newer elements of future vision that we often find ourselves talking about in our videos or articles. Unfortunately, the so-called "democratic" West considers any demand for reform or emancipation by other nations as an aggression against its own hegemonic status, and this, we believe, is going to complicate the international scenarios more and more, especially this year, at least until the US elections, which will be the turning point that will mark the victory or defeat of the globalist elites.
It is surprising you all find that US elections will mark such a turning point. Not that I disagree or agree, but have you all made content regarding why that would so markedly be the case?
We were thinking of doing a video on elections around the world, because this year there have been and will be several important election dates for the BRICS countries (Russia, India, South Africa) as well, so we could address the U.S. elections as well. But we have not yet decided to do that for several reasons. To stay with the U.S., we would like to explain that this year's elections are, in our opinion, different: although many people think that nothing will change in case Trump wins, we are instead of the opinion that this time Trump himself and his associates are less naive than in the previous term and much better equipped to counter the Deep State, the real administrator of the U.S. government. We don't like to make predictions, but in this case it is hard to hold back in this kind of analysis.