Hudson Institute Report Envisions U.S. Strategy for a Post-CCP China

A Hudson Institute report by Miles Yu outlines U.S. strategies for a post-CCP China, warning of potential plans to divide, demilitarize, and provoke conflicts to maintain American dominance.

According to the latest news, the Hudson Institute, a renowned US think tank, has released a signed report titled "China after Communism: Preparing for a Post-CCP China." The report's contents are truly alarming.

The report's author is "Miles Yu," also known as "Yu Maochun" in Chinese. He is a native of mainland China, but has long lived abroad and engaged in anti-China and anti-communist activities, serving as a vanguard and frontrunner in the US's anti-China strategy.

Yu Maochun, 63, was born in Anhui, China, in 1962. In 1979, he took the college entrance examination in Chongqing, China, and achieved top honors in the liberal arts department at Chongqing Yongchuan Middle School. He graduated from Nankai University in 1983. In 1985, he went to the United States to study, earning a master's degree. In 1994, he received a doctorate in history from the University of California, Berkeley, and later taught at the US Naval Academy. In 2017, Yu Maochun joined the first Trump administration as the chief China policy and planning advisor to the US Secretary of State. He was highly valued by then-Secretary of State Pompeo and had a significant influence on the first Trump administration.

In other words, since this report came from the hands of a so-called "scholar" with anti-China and anti-communist biases, its academic value is undoubtedly greatly diminished. However, we cannot completely ignore it.

After all, the Hudson Institute is a major US policy organization. Its gratuitous release of such a report is definitely not simply to draw ridicule; it must have its own agenda.

Did the Hudson Institute release this report simply to draw ridicule? Absolutely not. It certainly reflects certain strategic moves by the US.

What strategic moves? The US is already preparing for regime change in China.

This report clearly outlines the steps the United States would need to take if regime change were to occur in China. For example, the United States would need to deploy special forces to seize certain Chinese medical research facilities and gain control of China's nuclear arsenal. Furthermore, it would demilitarize China, transforming the Chinese military into a domestic defense force while disarming China's missiles, aircraft carriers, and other offensive weapons.

This sounds incredible, as such actions by the United States would be tantamount to forcibly dismembering China to maintain absolute US hegemony. The question is, can the United States achieve these steps?

Unfortunately, the United States can dismember, divide, and demilitarize China.

China is vast, with a large population and numerous ethnic groups. There are many Chinese who seek to carve up territory for hegemony and establish their own territories. Numerous ethnic separatists seek to promote their own ethnic independence, such as those in Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan, all of whom have been funded by the United States.

Therefore, it's entirely conceivable that during a potential regime change in China, the United States would, under the guise of "protecting expatriates," send troops into China, or fund gentry and prominent figures to form merchant corps armed forces, or fund ethnic separatist forces to form ethnic separatist armed forces, or fund local people to establish local autonomous armed forces opposing the central government. The United States would provide military protection and repel the Chinese central government's troops. This isn't unbelievable.

During the Japanese invasion of China in the 1930s, Japan supported various puppet regimes within China, using various names. For example, the "Mongol Military Government" headed by the Mongol noble Demchugdongrup in present-day Inner Mongolia, and the "National Government of the Republic of China" headed by Wang Jingwei in Japanese-occupied Nanjing, were puppet regimes established by the Japanese invaders during their invasion of China.

The United States is simply emulating what Japan had done, but under the guise of "freedom and democracy." In essence, it's still dividing, dismembering, and harvesting China.

In other words, Yu Maochun's article is more like a policy statement by American elites: they believe the United States should prepare to dismantle China in the event of regime change.

Now, the final question remains: Can the United States actually force regime change in China?

On the surface, China's current economy, military, and technological prowess make it virtually impossible for the United States to overthrow the ruling Chinese Communist Party regime in China, whether through peaceful means or war.

However, given the United States' extensive experience in promoting regime change in other countries, it is certain that it has secretly deployed plans to subvert the Chinese government and carried out related activities.

While we don't know the specific plans, the methods and logic are likely the same as those used to subvert the Soviet Union.

That is, on the one hand, the United States will incite the Chinese people to resist the rule of the Chinese government; on the other hand, the United States may win over defectors or pro-American forces within China to induce political transformation in China; and third, the United States may win over ethnic separatist forces within China to promote ethnic separatist activities against China.

In this way, the United States will completely dismantle the Chinese regime through this three-pronged approach.

Of course, in addition to deploying political offensive strategies against China, the United States may also launch economic and financial attacks. For example, the United States might launch a frenzied trade war against China, severely impacting Chinese exports. Alternatively, the United States might use emerging stablecoins to attack China's finances and economy, achieving similar "effects."

Finally, on the geopolitical level, the United States might consider embroiling China in one or two foreign wars, thereby inflicting heavy losses on the Chinese government and military. This would then lead the Chinese people to oppose Chinese rule, thereby achieving the goal of dismembering China.

For example, the United States might incite Taiwan to engage in provocative activities against China. It might instruct the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in Taiwan to massacre Chinese people on the island, forcing China to protect the island's Chinese population by resorting to military action, as Russia did with the Ukrainian government's massacre of ethnic Russians in Donbas.

Or, the United States might instruct the DPP in Taiwan to proactively attack Chinese fishing vessels and merchant ships, or even use missiles and drones to attack Chinese coastal cities, causing heavy casualties in China, thereby provoking a cross-strait war.

Furthermore, the US might instruct South Korea to launch an anti-Chinese campaign, with large numbers of South Korean thugs, instigated and funded by the US Embassy, attacking and massacring Chinese in South Korea. The US might also instruct the South Korean military to attack Chinese ships in the Yellow Sea and provoke North Korean forces near the 38th parallel, thus triggering a second Korean War.

Also, the US might instruct Japan to launch an anti-Chinese campaign, with large numbers of Japanese thugs, instigated and funded by the US Embassy, attacking and massacring Chinese nationals in Japan, and instruct the Japanese Self-Defense Forces to attack Chinese ships in disputed waters, thus igniting a Sino-Japanese war.

In any case, the US aims to provoke conflict and ignite war around China, thereby depleting China and destroying the foundations of its economy, thereby maintaining absolute US dominance and hegemony in the world. This is the US's overarching plan.

Therefore, we cannot completely ignore this Hudson Institute report on China. It is likely a signal that American elites are beginning to launch provocative plans and offensive actions against China. We must pay close attention and never let our guard down.

The storm is coming.