Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kristin's avatar

“With India at the forefront….BRICS will remain a non-Western alliance instead of an Anti-west alliance.” I hope so! And while I appreciate learning more about India’s diplomatic positioning from your article and the External Affairs press conference video, I also hope that your idea—regarding the conflicts of interest between beleaguered sub-continental regions of India and the BRI, being purely in the self-interest of China and her western trading interests—? I hope China’s own principled WinWin approach can uphold that the BRI will eventually itself resolve these issues and prove to be also in the best interests of those who currently fear and resist the progress that could actually help to eliminate the current terrorist factions as the BRI moves forward productively and prosperously stabilizing these regions via trade infrastructure. It seems to me that terrorist factions can only survive in poverty-ridden regions where preying on and inciting division among poor and vulnerable people where no hope of societal betterment is allowed to occur. I don’t see China or the BRI as fomenting the problem. I see them as persistently addressing problems and innovatively seeking positive solutions for all involved.

I also see India in this light! AND— As far as I can tell, the founding principles of the entire original BRICS membership and its ongoing careful expansion is also still guided by this light! May it eventually also light up the dark stuffy rubbish filled collective-west sponsored karaoke rooms! When it does I’m sure they’ll want to call in China’s excellent habitat for humanity renovation and housekeeping services! Lol

(India should no doubt contribute sustenance to the waisted journalistic and political singers’ integrity, serving it ayurvedically, since we in the west are starving for it!

Thankyou and

Namaste! 💓🫶💓🙏💖🕊️

Expand full comment
Calda's avatar

I discovered this blog, and I will follow it. I enjoyed this article.

I agree with you (I am a dilettante, not an expert of nothing) in the presentation of the BRICS as anti-western group with common interests and a only-way politic. I see that on a journalist called Pepe Escobar, that lacks on professionality when he say that there is a clear and direct union against the West. They ignore the complexity of the other countries, the contradictions between multiple interests. I am from Spain, and it is totally right that India is treated (when is treated, once a year or so...) for the media and in the minds of people like nothing; when the India it is in the top-3.

For example, remaining on logistic issues:

India wanted the IMEC with Israel and AS and want a neutral position similar to Turkey, taking advantage from the different players. Russia or Iran had logistic projects o their territory shared with India, like the NSTC; but there also have logistic projects with China through Central Asia and also Turkey. There is also the most important corridors: the sea ones. That's explain what you mentioned of China and Pakistan. And that just talking about logistic and talking of these countries (if we add ASEAN or Japanimagine... just for say), without mentioning the concerns of Russia regarding to China in Siberia in a future, the interest of China of using Pakistan as a contra-balance to India and also Russia (added to the connection with the Indic Ocean saving a possible block of Malaca). They talk about the Islam like a one entity; my God: the Islam is so plural, and the conflicts between different confessions and groups is huge. In few words: they make a epistemological sin: reductionism and manicheism.

Regards,

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts